In an ideal civilization, I know "2 wrongs do not make a right" but in the real world (or at least mine) I have actually frequently uncovered that although they may not make a right, they frequently stop further "wrongs".
You are watching: Who said two wrongs don t make a right
However, that does not sheight smug third parties periodically commenting "2 wrongs do not make a right" - what would be a an appropriate proverbial response?
To provide the reference for Peter Shor"s comment, currently removed:
fight fire with fire
to fight against an enemy by making use of the same approaches or tools that the adversary uses
evil prospers as soon as great males perform nothing
This saying appears in miscellaneous creates. Here"s one
Edmund Burke, among the forea lot of political speakers of 18th centuryEngland also, said: "All that is important for the triumph of evil is thatexcellent males carry out nothing."
To be politically correct I suppose some would readjust it to, "evil prospers when great people do nothing"
I was going to say “the ends justify the means” and also attach to Wiktionary. That article links to “all’s fair in love and war”, which I prefer a lot much better as a retort to “2 wrongs...”
Leviticus 24:19–21 has:
“eye for an eye; tooth for a tooth”
which might be ‘appropriate’ to the poster’s objective in some circumstances, although civilized societies are meant to have actually outgrown this mindset.
(Not strictly a proverb, but biblical quotations have that sort of status. )
"Don"t let the perfect be the foe of the good", tright here are times wright here an action might be wrong but it"s still the ideal option you"ve got. An insistence upon some fanciful perfect activity that realistically cannot be completed in the situations - and also therefore doing nopoint - may well make things also worse.
Don"t dish it out if you can"t take it.
This phrase says that someone who does something poor implicitly opens up themselves as much as having actually poor things done to them. Two wrongs do not make a best, however it is even more acceptable to wrong someone who has actually wronged you. A second wrong in retaliation for a very first one may not be the "right" point to execute, yet the perboy had actually it coming.
If someone calls you a foul name, you might respond in type. While someone might point out that "two wrongs don"t make a right", you can justify your retort by arguing that the perboy "shouldn"t dish it out if they can not take it".
Consider a details case: if a "wrong" was "damages to a ship" on the starboard side - leading to said ship to list - and also an additional, intentional but measured/controlled "wrong" was judiciously impacted to the port side such that the list was corrected, the ship "righted", resides saved, etc. - it would certainly be true that "2 wrongs make aright" (the ship in this case).Is this a retort? Not yet, yet it does provide a basis for defense of the initial "proverb" (which it is not, biblically speaking).
Like many sayings, intfinished definition is dependent on the meaning as taken by the speaker (also if colloquial / common), viewed definition as perceived by a hearer. Only after creating "intfinished meaning" ca valuable dialog begin.
See more: Q: Why Did The Computer Go To The Doctor ? Q: Why Did The Computer Go To The Doctor
My frequent answer to human being that say this to me is, "Does your hypocrisy recognize no bounds?" and also continue to question their moral and also ethical borders to recognize the reasons they believed my actions were in any method wrong.
Highly active question. Earn 10 reputation (not counting the association bonus) in order to answer this question. The reputation need helps defend this question from spam and also non-answer task.
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse various other concerns tagged phrase-repursuits idiom-repursuits proverbs or ask your own question.
nlinux.org proverb for "They danced, however didn't take a bow", as for failing good work on a last step