"Angela was curious about the unopened letter on the table and wondered for whom it was intended."

I think the whom should be replaced with who because the sentence have the right to be recomposed as

Angela was curious around the unopened letter on the table and wondered "that was it intended for?"

Correct answer: the sentence consists of no error.

You are watching: Many english speakers mix up ‘who’ and ‘whom’. do you know which of these sentences is incorrect?

why am I wrong?


*

mc01 If you check your friendly community referral grammar, I'm afraid you'll find that's not how it works at all.
"Who is it supposed for ?" is incorrect, both because of the mix up between direct object and also subject and likewise bereason of the preposition at the finish of the sentence.

Whereas most English speakers have actually lazily slipped right into typically placing prepositions at the end of sentences, it looks and also sounds sloppy in the written create.

The correct versions would be "For whom is it meant".

Who is supplied as soon as referring to the subject of the sentence and also whom when referring to the direct object.

Thus:

The man that stole my wallet is in jail.The man whom the dog little is in hospital.


*

When "who" is the object of a preposition it have to be replace via "whom". Both of your sentences are correct.

For whom is it meant? (Correct)

Who is it meant for? (Correct)

For that is it meant? (Incorrect)


*

*

In strict registers, WHO acting as the object of a verb or a preposition is constantly cast in the objective situation, whom. If you rewrite the clause without ‘pied-piping’—with the preposition for ‘stranded’ at the and—whom is still called for in formal writing:

Angela was curious around the unopened letter on the table and wondered whom it was intended for?

Tright here is for this reason no error in the sentence as initially created.

See more: Erinn Hayes Two And A Half Men : Awkward Tv Exits, Erinn Hayes

Spontaneous colloquial speech, but, is less demanding; objective whom is rare in conversation (unmuch less the speaker is working from a all set text or is deeply skilled in the strict style), and practically never before occurs at the head of a clausage. Consequently, when you introduce the clause as straight quotation this effectively reflects colloquial intake, not formal.


*

Who or whom? "Figure 1 depicts a security mechanism, detecting pedestrians whom are crossing dangerous areas."

website design / logo design © 2021 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. rev2021.11.19.40795


Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exreadjust can keep cookies on your gadget and also disclose information in accordance via our Cookie Policy.