Ubisoft"s Watch Dogs 2 has actually only been out for a day or so, yet the game has actually currently managed to surround itself with controversy. All of this started as soon as a player common a screenshot of the game"s full-frontal digital nudity to his Twitter, an action that obtained answered by Sony through a short-lived, 1-month, ban from using the console"s network-related features.

You are watching: Is there nudity in watch dogs 2

The player required to neoGAF to share his story:


I received my copy of Watch Dogs 2 on Saturday evening as a result of a mistake on Amazon Prime Now and also I"ve been having an excellent time via the game so much. On Sunday evening I accidentally blew up a few woguys in a earlier alley with a gas pipe and then I experienced *it*; someone at Ubisoft had actually rendered a complete vagina on one (or perhaps more) of the females in the game.

I took a picture of this funny oversight with the ingame camera and mutual it on twitter for my friends to view and also I posted it in one of the Watch Dogs at an early stage release threads on right here. Cut to tonight wright here I can not accessibility any type of solutions while playing the game and then when I tried to authorize in tbelow was an extremely brief message about my account being suspended.

After sending a message to Sony"s customer assistance company, he obtained a reply stating that the ban was bereason of sharing "content of an adult or sexual nature" which is versus Sony"s Code of Conduct. Nevermind that Watch Dogs 2 is rated "M" for mature by the ESRB, which already infers that the game in question has content that is not intended to be consumed by anyone that is not, well, mature. The ESRB web page also mentions that there is male and female nudity included in the game, so it"s not choose it was snuck right into the game without Sony"s expertise prior to the game"s launch. The picture below is a censored variation of it, you deserve to see it (entirely NSFW) in this tweet.

*

Sony likewise doesn"t seem to enpressure an age lock on screenshots, which means that all screenshots uploaded are openly common with everyone in Sony"s ecosystem, in enhancement to being shared to the social media app of your choice. It seems favor the suspended player managed to gain himself on the receiving finish of an oversight in Sony"s mechanism. If you foracquire the actual content of the screenswarm for a minute, all the player did was share a screenshot consisting of content discovered within the game without resorting to mods or other third-party devices in a game that"s been officially licensed for the PlayStation 4. All he did was share something he found funny.


Games like Grand also Theft Auto V and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt additionally had actually its fair share of genitals flopping about your screen. This wasn"t a problem then, so why is it now?

Luckily for the player in question, Sony reversed the temporary suspension as soon as this story got picked up by the games media.

See more: What Performance Style Is Heard In This Excerpt? Ch 17 Listening Quiz: Farmer: Fair Phyllis Lg 6


https://twitter.com/Swizzasaur/status/798685380371501056

That, however, is not the end of this specific story. After the story damaged Ubisoft was quick to release a statement saying that they would rerelocate the full-frontal nudity from the game in a future upday. The following is from a statement sent by Ubisoft to Polygon:

We’re mindful that among the NCOMPUTER models in Watch Dogs 2 is rendered in a means that is especially explicit.

While Watch Dogs 2 is a mature-rated game, we apologize and will certainly upday this NPC design to make it more consistent via other NPC models in the game in a patch to be released this week. We also are functioning via our first-party partners to encertain that players have the right to proceed to play and share all content from the game within the bounds of the first parties’ corresponding codes of conduct.

This story highlights 2 things: we"re still not incredibly comfortable through explicit sexuality in games, and Sony"s plan about shared content isn"t exceptionally well-created if they"re banning players who haven"t really done anything wrong.

What execute you think of this story? Was Sony justified in suspending the player? Let us understand in the comment area dvery own below!